Skip to content
The IFCM Magazine

Your Choral Voice in the world

Secondary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • ICB Collection
    • 2020
      • October 2020
      • July 2020
      • April 2020
      • January 2020
    • 2019
      • October 2019
      • July 2019
      • April 2019
      • January 2019
    • 2018
      • October 2018
      • July 2018
      • April 2018
      • January 2018
    • 2017
      • October 2017
      • July 2017
      • April 2017
      • January 2017
    • 2016
      • October 2016
      • July 2016
      • April 2016
      • January 2016
    • 2015
      • October 2015
      • July 2015
      • April 2015
      • January 2015
    • 2014
      • October 2014
      • July 2014 – WSCM10 Program Book
      • April 2014
      • January 2014
    • 2013
      • October 2013
      • July 2013
      • April 2013
      • January 2013
    • 2012
      • October 2012
      • July 2012
      • April 2012
      • January 2012
    • 2011
      • October 2011
      • July 2011
      • April 2011
      • January 2011
    • 2010
      • October 2010
      • July 2010
      • April 2010
      • January 2010
    • 2009
      • October 2009
      • July 2009
      • April 2009
      • January 2009
    • 2008
      • October 2008
      • July 2008
      • April 2008
      • January 2008
    • 2007
      • October 2007
      • July 2007
      • April 2007
      • January 2007
    • 2006
      • October 2006
      • July 2006
      • April 2006
      • January 2006
    • 2005
      • October 2005
      • July 2005
      • April 2005
      • January 2005
    • 2004
      • October 2004
      • July 2004
      • April 2004
      • January 2004
    • 2003
      • October 2003
    • 1991
      • October 1991
      • April 1991
  • Translators needed!
  • Propose an article
  • ICB Sections
    • Message from the President
    • Message from the Editor
    • FocusPosts about the ICB dossier content
    • IFCM News
    • Choral World News
    • Choral Technique
    • Impossible Interviews
    • Repertoire
    • Composers’ Corner
    • Book Review
    • CD Review
  • ICB Space Order
  • ICB STAFF
  • Events
  • Русский Русский
    • English English
    • Français Français
    • Deutsch Deutsch
    • Español Español

Choral Memory: Developing & Sustaining Tonal Excellence in Choirs (Page 24)

Choral Memory:
Developing & Sustaining Tonal Excellence in Choirs

By Carol Beynon, Jennifer Beynon-Martinec and Jakub Martinec

As the title of this paper implies, the concept of choral memory, referring to the development and sustainability of a distinctive sound within a choir over a period of time, may be one indicator of the health and longevity of a choral organization. Is it possible that this term, derived from the business and administration theories of organizational memory may inform our understanding about development and growth in choirs? The authors of this paper have a cumulative 60 years of experience as conductors of boys’ and men’s choirs and the subject of the development of choral tone is a constant area of discussion and research in their work. We begin this paper with a brief narrative account.

The primary author was the co-founder of the community-based Amabile Boy’ & Men’s Choirs. While the numbers of male singers were reasonably constant and healthy, and parental and community support and enthusiasm were high, the first few years were a struggle musically. Each season, half of the treble choir would move into the male youth choir as their voices began the inevitable change process and we would start developing a sound all over again with 8 and 9 year old non-readers and inexperienced singer musicians. At the same time, the newly changed voices with their extremely limited range and unpolished tone quality would move into the developing Tenor-Bass choir, trying to learn to sing with a brand new and often unpredictable voice. As a result both the treble and youth male choirs sounded young and immature.

None of the story told thus far is news to anyone who has worked with boys’ choirs anywhere in the world. Each time he heard us perform and listened to our frustrations about the lack of growth in choral tone, Amabile conductor colleague, John Barron CM, would say that the choirs would develop a good choral tone over time and a sense of choral memory would emerge once the singers themselves had a concept of choral tone in their own minds. With patience and consistent, good teaching, he said the sound that we were seeking would begin to emerge, and once it was there, it would lock in and even the new choristers would almost automatically pick up our sound.

Primus: Amabile Men’s Choir

Coincidentally in the third season, four university students and experienced singers joined the Tenor-Bass youth choir, and even though they only represented four of the 25 members, their singing provided a solid foundation on which to build a more mature choral sound and provided examples for the younger adolescent boys to emulate. That season, finally, the choristers with younger voices began to make a dramatic change in developing an acceptable choral sound. The next season, the university students graduated and there was no one of similar voice or maturity to replace the former leaders. However, even though the older students were no longer in the choir, listeners commented on mature sound of the youth male choir. Having these four young men in the choir seemed to be the catalyst for the other singers to hear a model they wanted to emulate and to work harder to develop a better choral tone. During that one year, the older voices served to imprint the sound of the entire Amabile Young Men’s Ensemble in a permanent way, and all of the singers began to understand and have a sense of the choral tone they wanted to achieve. Reverting back to the previous immature sound would have seemed obvious since the new members who came into the choir had newly changing voices without much tone colour. However, the highly-motivated singers and conductors moved collectively forward from that point to continue their development of a more mature and polished tonal quality within the choir. Their choral tone was a subject of constant subject of discussion amongst the members on a regular basis and the choir gradually became known for its artistic excellence and through a concept of choral memory, became known for its distinctive warm tone colour.

Their own choral experience and John Barron’s sage advice about the concept of choral memory caused these authors to consider the concept of choral memory from a theoretical perspective. A search through the choral literature yielded no clues. Perhaps, we thought, organizational theory could help us to understand why certain choral organizations grow and flourish, while others remain static and/or unremarkable.

Organizational Learning. The ability for an inanimate object such as an organization to have personal capacities to learn seems unique. The pioneer of organizational learning theory, Peter Senge (1990) posits that learning occurs when organizations interact with their environments and grow or improve through increasing their understanding of what it is they do. While the actions an organization takes may be experimental, imitative, adaptive or carefully planned, an organization’s ability to learn may make the difference between its thriving or perishing in the years ahead. The literature on organizations would indicate that an organization’s growth–or lack thereof–becomes a collective of the people who work within that organization, and cumulatively, each person’s action–or inaction–leads to or away from organizational productivity or what is called learning in the literature. In other words, it is the notion of a community of learners that emerges in relation to organizational and cultural structure and change emanates from the understandings about the nature of learning. But, organizational/community learning is not merely the sum of the individual member’s learning. In fact, it is–and this is a fact most applicable to choir development–the lowest common denominator in organizational learning. The research shows that individual learning, instead of guaranteeing learning, may indeed inhibit or prevent organizational growth. It is critical that the whole organization learn, not merely rely on one expert’s knowledge (i.e., conductor) but to rely on social interaction for group learning (Mitchell & Sackney, 2000). The relationship, then, between individual and members within the community is critical, and is based on an interactional model of causation in which personal factors associated with individuals, environmental events and behaviours operate as interacting determinants of one another. Human learning in the context of a particular community of learners is not only influenced by the organization, but has consequences for it and produces phenomena at the organizational level that go beyond anything we could infer simply by observing learning processes in isolated individuals. Human rationality complicates the concept even further. Organizational learning occurs if any members (i.e., individual singers, conductor, or accompanist) and units (i.e., sections) acquire knowledge that can change the range of behaviours of the organization.

Organizational memory has been continually recognized as an integral component of an organization’s ability to learn. Even when seemingly critical members leave the organization, enough collective wisdom or memory is left behind for incumbents and new members to make the organization continue to grow. Thus, a significant component of organizational learning is that of organizational memory. Organizational memory is grounded in information acquisition, storage, and transmission rooted in the beliefs, theories and ideologies of the culture which are conserved through systems of socialization, experimentation and control. Memory is knowledge stored in indexes and encyclopedic form and choirs (i.e., conductors, accompanists, singers) have vast stores of such information. Organizations have repertoires of activities for acquiring the information and improving what organizations can do. Building and modifying the repertoire are fundamental activities because they embody learning in routines, thus constituting a major form of organizational memory. Even when the participants leave, organizational memory protects the organization so it can survive and grow further (Senge, 1990). Building upon and modifying the repertoire constitute a major form of organizational memory (e.g., repetition of an existing piece of repertoire). Participants in an organization are the ones who decide on the worthiness of information that emanates from the leader and organizational memory is represented by the structures used to retrieve, organize, modify, and/or even make use of that knowledge. Participants decide how the information is coded, processed and even retrieved. Past experience is of utmost importance in creating change in an organization because memories of previous successes tend to invoke further risk-taking and dynamic innovation.

Amabile Young Men’s Ensemble

Choral Memory. While choral organizations are seen as instruments of the aesthetic, they are often based on a rationale and rigid structure that is linear, involves chain-of-command decision-making, differentiation of tasks, hierarchical supervision above and within the choir, formal rules and regulations, and professes certain ideologies. While social relationships are seen as an integral component of choirs, collaborative decision-making is not. Development may be based on repeated practices–regardless of participants–and change is both cosmetic and short-lived. But second order change or penetrating, intensive restructuring requires a deeper level of organizational management.

Choral memory is a multi-faceted phenomenon that evolves in a choir even in its first year of existence, involves learning and unlearning, and is essential for the growth of the organization. There is the memory that serves the bureaucratic structures of the choir, the memory that serves as a foundation for a music education program and applies to the individual level of each singer in the choir, and there is the choral memory of the sound that emerges and becomes idiosyncratic to the choir. As expert choral conductors work to transform vocal technique, musicianship and pedagogy into their concept of sound within the ensemble, the tonal quality develops and settles as a basic constant and consistent foundation over time. While the distinctiveness and singularity of that tone is a requisite to most conductors, it is maintained through continuous chorister development as well as conductor growth. Most conductors and their singers, however, are never totally satisfied with the sound even at its most mature level. Nor can they afford to be complacent in this regard because it is the ongoing development in technique, repertoire and performance standard that not only sustains the foundation of the sound but keeps improving it. It is this ongoing development in the learning community that ensures the choir is a healthy learning community. We posit that there are two factors at work: 1) it is the sustainability of the particular sound that indicates a healthy community of learners; and, 2) it is the ongoing strengthening and maturing of that choral sound that comes with longevity.

At the beginning of a new season, conductors of seasoned choirs often report that, even though a large percentage of the membership may have changed, it is always amazing yet ameliorating to hear the first warmups and recognize the distinctive but familiar choral sound of the choir. How does this happen? One would think that a choir’s sound is based on the distinctive voices of the immediate singers and coloured by the personalities within the group. But, initial findings are showing that this is a false assumption. The indicator seems to be a sense of organizational choral memory that is more entrenched than the collection of individuals in the choir. This information was borne out in conversations we had with six choral conductors of excellent community-based children’s, youth and adult choirs about the phenomenon of their choral sound in their choirs. Their comments served to affirm our belief that choral memory does evolve over time and indeed indicates that these choirs did become learning communities. The overall sound in elite choirs is coloured by the conductor’s ability to train and develop that sound based on a particular preference that s/he has. Even idiosyncratic voices can be honed into a definitive sound that is particular to that conductor and this process begins with the advent of a new program or new conductor.  These experienced conductors told us that choral memory involves learning vocal technique and then unlearning certain technique as new and more advanced information and/or abilities replace preliminary instruction.

Organizational learning theory fits the context of the personal example with which we began this paper. In relation to tonal development in these beginning male choirs, John Barron wisely advised that a conductor must have a concept of sound in mind and must continue working toward it even though the environment is always in a state of flux. In this one case study, the university students contributed to both an event and a process of organizational learning because the choir as a unit was ready to learn; they worked together to develop a sound that not only began to emulate and complement the older singers, but also began to emerge as a cohesive sound unit. How this learning occurred is interesting and vital to understanding how choirs develop. The concept of choral memory has the potential for helping us understand how healthy choral organizations develop, and these initial findings point to a need for further research to explore the fit between organizational theory and choral development.

 References:

Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning environment. Tokyo: Swets & Zeitlinger.

 Newton, P.M. (2005) Ensemble Learning: A Lens for Group Learning in Schools.

The Journal of Educational Thought.39(1): 75 – 88.

Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. NY: Doubleday.

Turc, E. & Baumard, P. (2007). Can organizations really unlearn? In McInerney, C. Day, R. (Eds.).  Rethinking Knowledge Management, pg 125 – 146.

 

About the Authors:

The co-authors of this article are specialists in the training and development of boys and men’s voices.

Dr Carol Beynon is Co-artistic Director of the Amabile Boys & Men’s Choirs of London, Canada, Associate Professor of Music Education, and Associate Vice Provost of the Graduate & Postdoctoral Studies at the University of Western Ontario. E-mail: beynon@uwo.ca

 

 

 

Jennifer Beynon-Martinec is a specialist in vocal technique and conductor of the Young Men’s Choir in Boni Pueri, music teacher with the English International School, and a faculty member in vocal and choral pedagogy at Charles University in Prague. She is a former member of the World Youth Choir. E-mail: beynon-martinec@bonipueri.cz

 

 

 

Jakub Martinec is assistant head master of Boni Pueri, the Czech Boys Choir School and conductor of the Boni Pueri touring choir. With Boni Pueri, he has conducted performances in many of the great concert halls in the world. E-mail: martinec@bonipueri.cz

Choral Memory: Developing & Sustaining Tonal Excellence in Choirs

2020-01-15
By: Carol Beynon, Jennifer Beynon-Martinec and Jakub Martinec
On: January 15, 2020
In: Choral Technique
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

Conductors Without Borders – OFADAC/IFCM

2020-01-15
By: RUBÉN DARÍO VIDELA
On: January 15, 2020
In: IFCM News
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

Irregular Meters in South-eastern European Folk Music

2020-01-15
By: Theodora Pavlovitch
On: January 15, 2020
In: Focus
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

The Choir: An Instrument of Social Inclusion in Azerbaijan

2020-01-15
By: Leyla Muradzade
On: January 15, 2020
In: Choral World News
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

What Could Have (Not) Been Said – A digression on the importance of lyrics for the understanding of Renaissance music

2019-04-15
By: Manuel Oviedo-Vélez
On: April 15, 2019
In: Choral Technique
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

Mahler’s Choral Symphonies: Philosophical And Technical Elements Of Choral Usage

2019-04-15
By: Adamilson Guimarães de Abreu
On: April 15, 2019
In: Focus
With: 1 Comment

…Read More →

Jāzeps Vītols 6th International Choral Conductor Competition

2019-04-15
By: AIRA BIRZIŅA
On: April 15, 2019
In: Choral World News
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

San Juan, Argentina, the great choral pole in growing development

2019-04-15
By: Dr. T. J. Harper & María Elina Mayorga
On: April 15, 2019
In: Choral World News
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

Rehearsal management

2019-01-15
By: Walter Marzilli
On: January 15, 2019
In: Focus
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

Sacred Music from Poland

2019-01-15
By: Karolina Silkina
On: January 15, 2019
In: Composers' Corner
With: 0 Comments

…Read More →

Posts navigation

Previous 1 … 23 24 25 … 79 Next

IFCM Partners

International Music Council

Sponsoring

Translate

Go to Today

may, 2025

Sort Options

Sort By:

date

Date

No Events

Categories

  • A trip to Venice
  • Book Review
  • CD Review
  • Children & Youth Choirs
  • Choral Technique
  • Choral World News
  • Composers' Corner
  • Focus
  • IFCM News
  • Impossible Interviews
  • Message from the Editor
  • Message from the President
  • Repertoire
  • Score Review
  • Stories
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • October 2023
  • July 2023
  • April 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • April 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • April 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • January 2018
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • April 2012
  • January 2012
  • October 2011
  • July 2011
  • April 2011
  • January 2011
  • October 2010
  • July 2010
  • April 2010
  • January 2010
  • October 2009

Daily Top Posts

  • A Conductor’s Guide to Ligeti’s "Lux Aeterna"
    A Conductor’s Guide to Ligeti’s "Lux Aeterna"
  • Coming Together for the Asia Choral Grand Prix
    Coming Together for the Asia Choral Grand Prix
  • World Youth Choir Alumni Session 2023 — Session Summary
    World Youth Choir Alumni Session 2023 — Session Summary
  • Ligeti by...
    Ligeti by...
  • Frank Martin’s Mass for Double Choir
    Frank Martin’s Mass for Double Choir
  • The European Festival of Youth Choirs Basel: 2000 young singers at the heart of Europe
    The European Festival of Youth Choirs Basel: 2000 young singers at the heart of Europe
  • György Ligeti Street in Budapest
    György Ligeti Street in Budapest
  • Sharing spiritually-inspired choral music: Exploring commonalities and promising practices
    Sharing spiritually-inspired choral music: Exploring commonalities and promising practices

Facebook Page

Facebook Page

Contacts & Info

International Federation for Choral Music (IFCM)
Nadine Robin, IFCM Office Manager
PO Box 42318
Austin TX 78704, USA
office@ifcm.net

Privacy Policy Designed using Magazine Hoot. Powered by WordPress.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkNoPrivacy policy